Evaluación de la usabilidad de la aplicación móvil Quali+ para personas con hipertensión arterial

Silva, Louyse Victória Ferreira da; Santos, Joelma Silva; Sousa, Mailson Marques de; Gouveia, Bernadete de Lourdes André; Oliveira, Simone Helena dos Santos; Almeida, André Atanasio Maranhão; Almeida, Taciana da Costa Farias

Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Brasil

Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem

Español English

Brasil

Español English

sumário « anterior atual seguinte »

Sumário

Original Article • Rev. Gaúcha Enferm. 45 • 2024 • https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2023.20230058.en copiar

Evaluación de la usabilidad de la aplicación móvil Quali+ para personas con hipertensión arterial

Autoría SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

RESUMEN

Objetivo:

Evaluar la usabilidad del prototipo de aplicación móvil “Quali+” para personas con hipertensión arterial.

Método:

Estudio descriptivo, transversal, de evaluación heurística de un prototipo de aplicación móvil realizado entre junio y julio de 2021, en un hospital universitario. Los participantes fueron 22 personas con hipertensión arterial en la ciudad de Campina Grande, PB, Brasil. Para medir la usabilidad se aplicó el instrumento Smartphone Usability QuestionnaiRE. Los niveles ( 70 puntos tienen buena usabilidad. Se utilizó estadística descriptiva.

Resultados:

Los principales hallazgos del estudio deben presentarse de manera concisa y clara, sin excesivos detalles. Los resultados deben estar alineados con la sección de resultados del artículo completo, proporcionando información más detallada sobre los análisis estadísticos realizados y los principales resultados encontrados.

Conclusión:

La evaluación de la usabilidad mostró que, aunque se trata de un prototipo, la aplicación tiene una buena usabilidad y puede considerarse para uso rutinario en la autogestión de la salud. Se necesita investigación futura para verificar su eficacia.

Descriptores:
Aplicaciones móviles; Hipertensión; Autocuidado; Diseño centrado en el usuario; Tecnología; Enfermería

Items	Mean (SD)	Min	Max
1. I found it easy to enter data into these applications. For example, using the “etc.”	3.68 (0.56)	2	4
2. When I make a mistake it is easy to correct it.	3.59 (0.73)	2	4
3. I found the help/tips given by the app to be useful.	4.00 (0.00)	2	4
4. It was easy to find the information I needed.	3.86 (0.46)	2	4
5. I felt in charge using this app.	3.59 (0.66)	2	4
6. I found that the time taken to complete the tasks is appropriate.	3.59 (0.59)	2	4
7. It was easy to learn how to use this app.	3.77 (0.52)	2	4
8. The sequences of actions in the app match the way I normally perform them. For example, the order of buttons, data fields, etc.	3.55 (0.51)	3	4
9. It's easy to do what I want using this app.	3.73 (0.63)	2	4
10. It was easy to navigate the app's menus and screens.	3.82 (0.51)	2	4
11. The application meets my needs.	3.86 (0.35)	3	4
12. I would recommend this app to others.	3.95 (0.21)	3	4
13. Even if I was in a hurry, I would be able to perform tasks in this application.	3.50 (0.74)	2	4
14. I found the app to be consistent. For example, all functions can be performed in a similar way.	3.50 (0.67)	2	4
15. It's easy to remember how to do things on this app.	3.68 (0.64)	2	4
16. I would use this app frequently.	3.68 (0.47)	3	4
17. The organization of menus and action commands (such as buttons and links) is logical, which allows you to easily find them on the screen.	3.73 (0.45)	3	4
18. I was able to complete the tasks successfully using this app.	3.77 (0.61)	2	4
19. I enjoyed using this app.	3.82 (0.39)	3	4
20. The application provides all the information necessary to complete tasks in a clear and understandable way.	3.82 (0.39)	3	4
21. I found the app very difficult to use.	1.14 (0.56)	0	3
22. The symbols and icons are clear and intuitive.	3.77 (0.42)	3	4
23. I found the texts easy to read.	3.91 (0.29)	3	4
24. I found the app unnecessarily complex. I had to remember, research or think a lot to complete the tasks.	0.95 (0.57)	0	3
25. The terminology used in texts, labels, titles, etc. is easy to understand.	3.73 (0.93)	0	4
26. I would need someone's support to use this app.	1.64 (1.04)	1	4
27. I felt comfortable using this app.	3.77 (0.52)	2	4
28. The app behaved as I expected.	3.77 (0.42)	3	4
29. I found it frustrating to use this application	1.05 (0.21)	1	2
30. I found the various functions of the application to be well integrated.	3.82 (0.39)	3	4
31. I felt very confident using this app.	3.82 (0.50)	2	4

Participants	Age	Gender	Total SURE score	Usability level
1	52	Female	99	80
2	56	Female	108	80
3	57	Female	108	80
4	44	Female	112	80
5	42	Female	112	80
6	63	Male	95	80
7	53	Female	106	80
8	39	Female	104	80
9	50	Female	106	80
10	26	Female	112	80
11	44	Male	111	80
12	59	Female	83	80
13	69	Female	99	80
14	49	Female	109	80
15	45	Male	106	80
16	30	Female	103	80
17	64	Female	97	80
18	43	Female	112	80
19	41	Male	111	80
20	44	Female	112	80
21	52	Female	111	80
22	55	Female	113	80

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Escola de Enfermagem Rua São Manoel, 963 -Campus da Saúde , 90.620-110 - Porto Alegre - RS - Brasil, Fone: (55 51) 3308-5242 / Fax: (55 51) 3308-5436 - Porto Alegre - RS - Brazil
E-mail: revista@enf.ufrgs.br

Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

[1] Corresponding author:
Taciana da Costa Farias Almeida E-mail: taciana.costa@professor.ufcg.edu.br