Accessibility / Report Error
(Updated: 2022/05/13)

About the journal

 

Basic Information

 

The Brazilian Journal of Plastic Surgery (Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica–RBCP) is the official scientific journal of the Brazilian Society of Plastic Surgery (Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica–SBCP) (ISSN 1983-5175, ISSN online 2177-1235). It is a quarterly publication with uninterrupted service since 1986 and from 2021 onwards, articles are also published in the form of advanced article publication - Ahead of Print (AOP). The RBCP is indexed in the Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO) and Scopus databases.

Its abbreviated title is Rev. Bras. Cir. Plást., which should be used in bibliographies, footnotes and bibliographical references and strips.

 

 

Indexed in

 
  • Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences literature - LILACS
  • Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal - LATINDEX
  • Scopus
  • SciELO
 

 

Intellectual Property

  The journal and its contents are licensed under a Creative Commons  (CC BY) Attribution 4.0 International License.  

 

Sponsors

 

 

 

 


 

Editorial Board

 

Editor

   

 

Coeditor

   

 

 Associate Editors

   

 

National Editorial Board

   

 

International Editorial Board

   

 

Editorial Production

   

 

 

 

Instructions to authors

 

 Scope and Policy

 

The Brazilian Journal of Plastic Surgery aims to record the scientific production in Plastic Surgery, foster the study, improvement and updating of professionals in the specialty.

The articles submitted to the RBCP should address topics on plastic surgery and related subjects. The RBCP publishes articles in the following categories: Editorial, Original Article, Review Article, Case Report, Ideas and Innovations, Special Article, and Letter to the Editor.

RBCP is an open access journal and does not charge any fees for article submission, review, translation and publication. All processes are carried out electronically.

Authors must declare that they are aware of the copyright licenses that will come into force if the manuscript is accepted and published in the RBCP.

Authors are responsible for the concepts provided in the articles. The journal and its contents are licensed under a Creative Commons (CC BY) Attribution 4.0 International License.

 

Authorship and Contribution Criteria

The criteria for authoring the articles should follow the recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Only those people who contributed directly to the intellectual content of the work should be listed as authors.

Authors must satisfy all of the following criteria to be able to have public responsibility for the content of the work:

1. Have conceived and planned the activities that led to the work or interpreted the results to which they arrived, or both;

2. Have written the work or revised the successive versions and participated in the review process;

3. Have approved the final version;

4. Agree to be responsible for all aspects of the work and ensure that issues related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are properly investigated and resolved.

We consider the corresponding author to be the person who handles the manuscript and correspondence during the publication process. We request that the corresponding author confirm that he has the authority to act on behalf of all co-authors in all matters relating to the publication of the manuscript, including supplementary material. The corresponding author is responsible for obtaining such agreements and informing co-authors of the manuscript's status during the submission, review and publication process. In addition, the corresponding author is the main contact for any questions (including those related to the work's integrity) after the publication of the article.

It is mandatory to include the ORCID ID for all authors, and a letter must be attached to the system with the ORCID ID of all authors to the electronic submission system.

The Committee on Publication Ethics (Cope) also provides comprehensive resources on authorship and authorship disputes, and we recommend everyone involved in editorial decisions become familiar with these resources.

We have adopted initiatives that allow transparency in authorship and contribution, such as the CRediT taxonomy.

People who do not fulfill the requirements above and who had purely technical or general support participation can be cited in the Acknowledgments section.

 

Preprints

RBCP accepts the submission of manuscripts previously deposited in preprint servers recognized by the journal. Preprints are manuscripts ready for submission to a journal and are deposited on an open access web server prior to or in parallel with journal submission for evaluation for formal publication as a peer-reviewed article.

 

Language

Articles should be written in English and Portuguese. Authors should follow current spelling guidelines and use simple, technical, and precise language; informal language should be avoided. The English version, when available, should be submitted to expedite publication. The printed version of the articles is published in Portuguese, whereas the electronic version of the articles is published in Portuguese and English, both in XML and PDF.

 

Retractions and Errata

The journal's editors will consider retractions and errata following COPE's Retraction Guidelines. If it is found that the author or RBCP made an error, the magazine will issue an errata. Retractions are generally reserved for articles with flaws so serious that their findings or conclusions should not be trusted. Manuscripts Accepted by the RBCP may make minor changes, such as those likely to occur during composition or review. Still, any substantive corrections will be made following the COPE Disclaimer.

 

Image Manipulation, Counterfeiting and Fabrication

When survey data is collected or presented as images, modifying these images can sometimes misrepresent the results obtained or their meaning. We recognize that there may be legitimate reasons for modifying images. Still, we hope that authors will avoid modifying images when this leads to falsification, fabrication or misrepresentation of their results.

 

Fraudulent Research and Misconduct in Research

When we are informed about fraudulent research or research misconduct by an author of the Brazilian Journal of Plastic Surgery, our first concern is the integrity of the published content. The Editor, co-editors, and associate editors will open an investigation to ascertain the facts. Any publication that contains fraudulent results will be withdrawn, or an errata will be issued. See the Disclaimers and Errata section of these guidelines for more information.

 

Versions and Adaptations

The RBCP does not modify existing published content, nor does it originate new materials to meet political or ideological requirements when we believe that these compromise the quality, effectiveness or accuracy of the materials or conflict with our Code of Ethics.

We grant volume licenses and subsidiary rights to third parties that allow the reproduction, reuse or adaptation of our content in different contexts, languages and territories. When we license volume rights, our authors and we retain the right to refuse approval for publication if we doubt the integrity and accuracy of the licensed edition.

 

Slander, Defamation and Freedom of Speech

Freedom of expression is fundamental to us as academic editors, but we do not support the publication of false statements that damage the reputation of individuals, groups or organizations. Our legal team can advise on defamation reviews before publication and deal with any defamation allegations eventually published in the RBCP.

 

Transparency

We strive to follow COPE's Principles of Transparency and Best Practices in Academic Publications and encourage our publication partners to defend these same principles.

Authors are encouraged to make available all content (data, program codes and other materials) underlying the manuscript text before or at the time of publication through a Data Availability Declaration that must be entered into the RBCP submission system. The Data Availability Statement should signal where the data associated with a document is available and under what conditions (licenses) the data can be accessed, including links (where applicable) to the dataset. Exceptions are allowed in cases of legal and ethical issues. The objective is to facilitate the evaluation of the manuscript and, if approved, to contribute to the preservation and reuse of the contents and the reproducibility of the research. The initiative increases transparency, enables compliance with data policies, encourages good scientific practice and trusts in published studies.

 

Registry Integrity

We keep a record of the existence of everything we publish with information (metadata) that describes each publication. Whenever we have to change the publication record, as in the case of research misconduct leading to retraction of a publication, we preserve the academic record as far as possible.

We apply these same principles to our marketing and do not modify or manipulate publications in our marketing activities.

When an article is accessed on our portal (www.rbcp.org.br), we provide it only in its entirety, which does not have the right to change its content in a way that is inconsistent with the licensing terms under which it was published.

 

Marketing Communication

Social media and e-mail communication are powerful tools to disseminate and interact with our publications, reach new readers, and keep content alive. However, such communication should not be made at the expense of the integrity of the content.

We reserve the right to reject or remove any ad when we doubt that it violates these Research Publication Ethics Guidelines. We also advertise our products and services to customers. We do this following our Privacy Policy, data protection regulations, the Advertising Standards Authority Guidance on Publication Marketing and our internal compliance procedures.

 

Final considerations

Other decisions regarding the ethics, misconduct, and integrity of scientific research are based on the Code of Conduct guidelines for Journal Editors (COPE), available at: http://publicationethics.org/files/Code_of_conduct_for_journal_editors_Mar11.pdf, and the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME), available at http://www.wame.org

 

 

Form and preparation of manuscripts

 

Manuscript Preparation

The journal adopts the Vancouver style - Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals, organized by the ICMJE - "Vancouver Group" (http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/manuscript-preparation). Compliance with these instructions is mandatory for the study to qualify for analysis.

 

Title page

Write the title of the article concisely in Portuguese and English. Write the authors' full names with their affiliations (Institution, Faculty and Department, City, State and Country), the ORCID and e-mail. Also inform the name, address and telephone number of the corresponding author. For studies presented at scientific meetings, indicate the name of the event, place, and presentation date. Potential conflicts of interest and funding sources must be declared.  Declare potential conflicts of interest and sources of funding. Please list up to eight authors and specify their contribution to the study. Authors are researchers who contributed substantially to the conception and design and/or data analysis and interpretation, drafted the manuscript or reviewed it critically for intellectual content, and approved the final manuscript.

 

Abstract in English and Portuguese

(only for Original Article, Special Article, Review Article, and Case Report)

The abstracts of Original Articles should contain Introduction, Method, Results, and Conclusions. The abstracts should explain the study's main findings without the need to resort to the main text. Write an abstract in English containing the following sections: Introduction, Methods, Results, and Conclusions. This abstract should be a faithful translation of the Portuguese abstract. For Review Articles and Case Reports, write unstructured abstracts in English and Portuguese. Abstracts should not exceed 250 words.

 

Keywords

Include five to ten keywords, in Portuguese and English. The descriptors should be based on the Health Sciences Descriptors (DeCS) published by Bireme, which are translations of the Medical Subject Headings from the National Library of Medicine (MeSH),

 

Main text

The text must be typed in double space, font Arial, size 12, margin 2.5cm on each side. The number of sections depends on the article category. Cite references as superscripts in the order of citation in the main text. Abbreviations and acronyms must be preceded by the terms in full, when mentioned for the first time in the text, and must not be used in the title and abstract. Abbreviations in the legends of tables and figures must be accompanied by their meaning.

The Introduction section should describe the purpose and rationale of the study and establish the study's theoretical basis. Indicate the importance of the study, and identify flaws or inconsistencies in the literature and/or difficulties in clinical practice that make the study relevant to the specialist.

The Objective section should indicate the purpose of the study clearly and concisely in one paragraph.

The Method section comprises observational and experimental elements, such as patients, laboratory animals, controls, inclusion and exclusion criteria when appropriate, and sufficient details to allow data reproduction in other studies. Add references for published but unfamiliar methods and describe new techniques in detail. Indicate the study period and study site(s) and the statistical methods and computer software used. Authors should declare that the study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Institution where the work was carried out and include the registration number in the text.

The Results section presents data in a logical sequence in the text, tables, and figures but does not add data already present in the text.

The Discussion section demonstrates knowledge and critical thinking and compares the obtained results with literature data. The scope and points of view of the study and the limitations and future perspectives should be described.

The Conclusions section should be concise and related to the proposed objectives.

The Acknowledgments section should be presented at the end of the text and contain the names of collaborators who contributed intellectually or technically to the research but did not meet the criteria for authorship and funding agencies.

 

References

References must be updated, and we recommend using the one from the last 5 years, with the exception of classic articles or articles relevant to the study. Cite the consulted references in Arabic numerals in superscript in the order of citation in the text. List the names of up to six authors; for references with more than six authors, cite the first six followed by et al. Present the references in the Vancouver style and abbreviate the journal titles according to the List of Journal Indexed in Index Medicus from the NLM. Different types of bibliographic references are shown below; other examples are available at the NLM website (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog/journals).

Article

Quintas RC, Coutinho AL. Risk factors for the impairment of surgical margins in resections of basal cell carcinomas. Rev Bras Cir Plást. 2008;23(2):116-9.

Book Chapter

D'Assumpção EA. Problems and solutions in rhytidoplasties. In: Melega JM, Baroudi R, eds. Plastic surgery fundamentals and art: cosmetic surgery. Rio de Janeiro:Medsi;2003. p.147-65.

Book

Saldanha O. Lipoabdominoplasty. Rio de Janeiro:Di Livros; 2004.

Thesis

Freitas RS. Jawbone elongation using an internal device: quantitative analysis of the results [doctoral thesis]. São Paulo: University of São Paulo Medical School; 2003. 97p.

Events

Carreirão S. Reduction mammoplasty. In: XXXVI Brazilian Congress of Plastic Surgery; November 11-16, 2001; Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Tables

Include up to four tables and number them sequentially, in Arabic numerals, in the order of appearance in the text. All tables should have a title, headed columns, and a citation in the text. Add legends and statistical tests at the bottom of each table.

Add tables only when necessary to understand the research and do not provide the information described elsewhere in the text.

Figures

Number the figures (graphs, images, and illustrations) sequentially, in Arabic numerals, in the order of citation in the text.

Add legends at the bottom of the figures and not within the figures. Abbreviations should be explained in the legends.

Original Articles should have no more than 20 figures, and each image attached to the study is counted as one figure. For instance, Figures 1 A, B, C, and D will be counted as four figures out of a total of 20.

The images of patients should have a uniform color background without foreign objects (e.g., door handles and lamps). The photographed field should be strictly limited to the topic of interest. In face photos, use the available computer resources to avoid identifying the patient and, if this is not possible, the patient should grant permission to publish the photo. If the figures have already been published, they must be accompanied by written authorization from the author/editor, with the original source of publication in the illustration caption.

Image resolution should comply with the following criteria:

  • Image 1: Di Lamartine J, Cintra Junior R, Daher JC, Cammarota MC, Galdino J, Pedroso DB, et al. Reconstruction of the nipple-areola complex with double opposing flap. Rev Bras Cir Plást. 2013;28(2):233-40.
  • Image 2: Alves JC, Fonseca RP, Silva Filho AF, Andrade Filho JS, Araujo IC, Almeida AC, et al. Extended resection in the treatment of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Rev Bras Cir Plást. 2014;29(3):395-403.
  • Image 3: Alves JC, Fonseca RP, Silva Filho AF, Andrade Filho JS, Araujo IC, Almeida AC, et al. Extended resection in the treatment of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Rev Bras Cir Plást. 2014;29(3):395-403.

Font: Adapted from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/pub/filespec-images/#fig-format

SECTIONS

Editorial - Articles selected for publication based on scientific relevance. These articles are written by the Editorial Board or assigned to renowned experts from different research fields. The Editorial Board may consider publishing editorials submitted spontaneously.

Original Article - Includes controlled and randomized studies, observational studies, and basic research with experimental animals. These articles should contain the following sections: Introduction, Objective, Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusion, References, and Abstract in Portuguese and English. The main text should have no more than 3000 words (excluding tables, references, and abstracts), 30 references, 20 images (presented either individually or in groups), and four tables.

Review Article - Critical and organized reviews of the literature, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses on a specific topic of clinical importance. The text should not exceed 3000 words (excluding references and tables) and six images presented individually or in groups. References should be current, preferably published in the last 5 years, and contain up to 40 citations.

Case Report - Description of patients or unique cases, especially rare diseases, and innovative forms of diagnosis and treatment. The text should contain the following sections: Introduction, which describes the importance of the subject matter and presents the objectives of the presentation of the case(s) in question; Case Report; Discussion, wherein relevant aspects are discussed and compared with the literature; Conclusion; and References. The main text should not exceed 1000 words (excluding references and tables), 10 references, and eight figures presented either individually or in groups.

Ideas and Innovations - Original and innovative studies. The text should not exceed 1000 words, 10 references, and 8 figures presented either individually or in groups; moreover, it should contain the following sections: Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusion, and References.

Special Article - Articles not classified in the above categories and for which the Editorial Board deems to be of particular relevance to the field. The review of these articles follows unique criteria, and there are no limits on word count or number of references.

Letter to the Editor - Comment, discussion, or article appraisals published in the RBCP. However, this category may contain other topics of general interest. The text should have up to 250 words and 5 references. Whenever possible, a list of the authors of the study will be published together with the letter.

 

 

Send of the manuscripts

 


MANUSCRIPT SUBMISSION

Manuscripts should be submitted electronically at www.rbcp.org.br. Authors who have not yet registered should do so before uploading the manuscript, following the instructions on the web page. Insert the texts, figures, and tables in the respective fields of the electronic submission system.

 

DECLARATIONS AND DOCUMENTS

Following the guidelines of the ICMJE, the following documents and statements should be uploaded together with the manuscript:

     • Cover Letter to the Editor-in-Chief describing the most relevant findings and conclusions of the manuscript and clarifying its scientific relevance. This letter should declare that the manuscript has not been previously published and has not been submitted for publication in another journal;
     • Letter informing the ORCID's of the authors, mailing address and the institution where the study was carried out;
     • Declaration of Potential Conflicts of Interest (document generated in the electronic system before manuscript submission). Conflicts of interest include the employment, sponsorship, or funding of any person or institution, public or private, with economic interests in the article's content. This statement will be added to the published article;
     • Approval of the study by the Research Ethics Committee of the institution where the work was carried out, and attachment of the protocol number and name of the said committee; 
(CAAE)
     • Informed Consent Form, when referring to research articles involving human beings;
     • Image use authorization term;
     • Copyright and permission to reproduce materials. Agreeing to the following terms:

- Authors retain copyright and grant RBCP the right of first publication;

- Authors have the right to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercial).

RBCP adopts the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0).
 
(Declarations and complementary documents must be included in the electronic submission system in the 'Attachments' field’).

 

ARTICLES ACCEPTED FOR PUBLICATION

Once accepted for publication, a proof of the edited article (PDF format) is sent to the corresponding author for evaluation and approval. Accepted articles are published immediately in the 'Ahead of Print' format on the website www.rbcp.org.br and, later, in a volume/issue of the RBCP.

 

 

Manuscript evaluation policy

 

Peer review

All papers are submitted to peer review by at least two reviewers. Acceptance is based on originality, significance and scientific contribution. The reviewers fill out a form in which they make a rigorous assessment of all the items that make up the work. In the end, they make general comments about the work and give their opinion on whether it should be published or corrected according to the recommendations. With this data, the Editor makes the final decision. In case of discrepancies between the evaluators, a new opinion may be requested for a better judgment. When the reviewers suggest changes, they are sent to the main author and the new version is sent back to the reviewers to verify that the suggestions/requirements have been met. The sending of a study may or may not be sent back to the original reviewer at the Editors' discretion. In exceptional cases, when the manuscript's subject so requires, the Editor may request the collaboration of a professional who is not on the Editorial Board's list to make the assessment (ad hoc reviewers). This entire process is carried out through the electronic submission system. The evaluation system is double-blind, ensuring anonymity throughout the evaluation process. Regardless of the result, authors have access to all assessments and questionnaires that are available in the electronic submission system. The dates of receipt and approval of the article for publication are informed in the published article to respect the authors' priority interests. The RBCP suggests to its editors and reviewers that they become familiar with and act according to the relevant best practice guidelines on peer review and follow the guidelines proposed by the COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Review.

Openness in peer review

The RBCP, following the recommendations of good practices in open science and transparency in evaluations, supports open peer review, making it possible to include in the approved article: the name of the editor responsible for evaluating the manuscript; to offer the referees and the corresponding author the opening of their respective identities; offer reviewers the option of publishing the review in the journal as a communication identified with DOI and capable of being indexed and cited with or without identifying the reviewer as the author.

 

 

Ethics Statement

 

Research with Humans and Animals

Research involving humans or animals must be approved by relevant Research Ethics Committees (CEP) and must comply with international ethical and legal standards for research. Authors must respect the human participants' right to privacy and obtain the necessary consent to publish before submission.

Research projects in human beings must comply with the Declaration of Helsink as revised in 2013  and studies carried out in Brazil must follow Resolutions 466/2012  and Resolution 510/2016, in addition to Circular Letter No. 166/2018 by the National Health Council. It is linked to the approval of the study by the Research Ethics Committee.

Investigations on animal models must comply with the rules applicable to these procedures, as specified in the Basel Declaration, in the ARRIVE guidelines - Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments and the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, USA). The Editorial Board of the Journal may refuse articles that do not strictly comply with the ethical precepts of the research, whether in humans or animals. Authors must identify precisely all drugs and chemicals used, including the names of the active ingredient, dosages and forms of administration. They should also avoid commercial or company names.

 

 

Conflict of interests

 

Conflicts of Interest and Financing

We guarantee that any publication on the Brazilian Journal of Plastic Surgery is free from undue influence. Authors who submit an article must declare any potential conflicts of interest that may interfere with the objectivity or integrity of a publication, stating whether the authors' institution at any time received payment or third-party service of any kind for the submitted work (including, but not limited to, funds, data monitoring committee, study type, manuscript preparation, statistical analysis, financial support for travel to meetings relevant to the study or other reasons, consulting fee, payment for writing or reviewing the manuscript, etc).

Conflicts of interest are situations that may exert undue influence on the presentation, review or publication of a work. They can be of a personal, commercial, political, academic or financial nature. Authors must include, as a supplementary file to the manuscript, a declaration of potential conflicts of interest of the authors. If accepted, this information will be published in the final version of the article. We also hope that anyone who suspects an undisclosed conflict of interest concerning a work published in the RBCP will inform us by sending an e-mail to rbcp@cirurgiaplastica.org.br

 

 

Clinical Trial Registry

 

Clinical trial registration

The RBCP supports the World Health Organization (WHO) and International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) clinical trial registration policies and recognizes the importance of these initiatives for the international registration and dissemination of information on open access clinical trials. Therefore, to qualify for publication, clinical trials should be registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov or an equivalent international repository before the beginning of data collection, and the identification number should be added to the end of the Abstract.

Within this context, the RBCP adopts the definition of clinical trial recommended by the WHO, which can be summarized as follows: "any research that prospectively designates humans for one or more interventions to assess their effects on health-related outcomes. Interventions include drugs, cells and other biological products, surgical, radiological procedures, devices, behavioral therapies, changes in care processes, preventive care, etc.“

 

 

Plagiarism and Editorial Misconduct

 

Plagiarism and Duplicity

Plagiarism

Plagiarism is defined as "using ideas, words, data or other material produced by another person without recognition".

Plagiarism can occur concerning all types of sources and means of communication, including:

• text, illustrations, musical quotes, extended mathematical derivations, computer code, etc .;

• material downloaded from websites or taken from manuscripts or other media;

• published and unpublished material, including lectures, presentations and gray literature.

We do not tolerate plagiarism in any of our publications, and we reserve the right to verify all submissions through Similarity Check/iThenticate e to ensure originality. Submissions containing suspected plagiarism, in whole or in part, will be rejected. If plagiarism is discovered after publication, we will adopt retraction following COPE's Retraction Guidelines. We hope that our readers, reviewers and editors will mention any suspicions of plagiarism by sending an e-mail to rbcp@cirurgiaplastica.org.br.

Duplicate and redundant publishing

Duplicate or redundant publication, or "self-plagiarism", occurs when work, or substantial parts of a work, is published more than once by the author (s) of the work without good cross-reference or justification for the overlap. It can be in the same language or a different language.

We do not support substantial overlaps between publications unless:

  • it is considered that, editorially, this will strengthen the academic discourse;
  • have the explicit approval of the original publication;
  • Include a quote from the original source.

We advise our readers, reviewers and editors to mention any suspicions of duplicate or redundant publication by sending an e-mail to rbcp@cirurgiaplastica.org.br.

When authors submit their studies to the RBCP, these manuscripts should not be considered, accepted for publication or in press in a different journal, book or similar entity.

 

 

Preparing the manuscript Manuscript evaluation policy

 

Before the publication, all articles sent to the Brazilian Journal of Plastic Surgery go through a review and arbitration process to guarantee their quality standard and the exemption in selecting works to be published. Initially, the secretariat evaluates the article to verify that it is complete and following the publication rules. All papers are submitted to peer review by at least two reviewers. Acceptance is based on originality, significance and scientific contribution. The reviewers fill out a form in which they make a rigorous assessment of all the items that make up the work. In the end, they make general comments about the work and give their opinion on whether it should be published or corrected according to the recommendations. With this data, the Editor makes the final decision. In case of discrepancies between the evaluators, a new opinion may be requested for a better judgment. When the reviewers suggest changes, they are sent to the main author and the new version is sent back to the reviewers to verify that the suggestions/requirements have been met. The sending of a study may or may not be sent back to the original reviewer at the Editors' discretion. In exceptional cases, when the manuscript's subject so requires, the Editor may request the collaboration of a professional who is not on the Editorial Board's list to make the assessment (ad hoc reviewers). This entire process is carried out through the electronic submission system. The evaluation system is double-blind, ensuring anonymity throughout the evaluation process. Regardless of the result, authors have access to all assessments and questionnaires that are available in the electronic submission system. The dates of receipt and approval of the article for publication are informed in the published article to respect the authors' priority interests. The RBCP suggests to its editors and reviewers that they become familiar with and act according to the relevant best practice guidelines on peer review and follow the guidelines proposed by the COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Review https://publicationethics.org/files/cope-ethical-guidelines-peer-reviewers-v2_0.pdf

 

 

Submission check list

 

CHECKLISTS

Before submitting the manuscript, authors should refer to the following checklist according to the article category:

 

 

 


 

Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica Rua Funchal, 129 - 2º Andar / cep: 04551-060, São Paulo - SP / Brasil, Tel: +55 (11) 3044-0000 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: rbcp@cirurgiaplastica.org.br